Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Dillon
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder
This is an action of assumpsit brought by the appellant against the appellee upon the following sealed instrument:
“This is to Certify that Levi Dillon & Sons have this day sold to B. Edwards, of Chicago, Ill., the imported Norman stallion, Cambrone, for the sum of eighteen hundred dollars. We-warrant the said stallion sound and healthy, but assume no' responsibility on account of disease or accident after this date. We guarantee that the said stallion, with proper handling, shall prove to be an average foal-getter. In case the said stallion shall fail to get colts, we agree to exchange him…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Deckard v. CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
- Harms v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Peine v. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Gram v. SetonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1828
- Walsh v. LennonIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hercules Powder Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Allen v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Alford v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Smith v. PackardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Green v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.