Legal Opinion

Goshorn v. Roger Sherman Transfer Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 13, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.

The question is whether the plaintiff, mother-in-law of the deceased employee, is a dependent within the meaning of the word as used in the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The compensation commissioner found that she was. The subordinate facts upon which his conclusion rested were as follows: The plaintiff’s daughter married the decedent in 1920. A son, Robert, was born of the marriage in 1921. When Robert was about five months old, the decedent and his family went to live with the plaintiff and her husband. In 1923 the plaintiff and her husband separated and she has not received any support from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Moore Shipbuilding Corp. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Massolini v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Scott's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Kiska v. SkrenskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API