Coffee v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOWEN, Chief Judge.
Three matters are presently before the Court in the above-captioned ease: (1) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (2) Plaintiffs’ “Notice of Objection or in the Alternative Motion to Strike” (Motion to Strike), and (3) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court heard oral argument on these matters on December 12, 1997. After careful consideration of the parties’ arguments and the relevant statutory and case law, Plaintiffs’ motions are DENIED and Defendant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART for the reasons stated below.
I. BACKGROUND
This…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- IRAOLA & CIA, S.A. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Bronx Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Brooks v. St. John's Motor Sales, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Iraola & Cia, S.A. v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- West Edna Associates, Ltd. v. Twin City Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020