Legal Opinion

Maytag Co. v. Hurley Machine Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 6, 1939No. 76; No. 77PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing' granted; and petition for rehearing granted. The orders denying certiorari (305 U. S. 599) are vacated, and the petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit *667Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is granted.

Messrs. Thomas G. Haight, Wallace B. Lane, Nelson E. Johnson, Oscar W. Jeffery, and Benton^ Baker for petitioner. Messrs. William H. David and Dean S. Edmonds for..respondents-.-

Reported below: 96 F. 2d 87. See also 305 U. S. 599.

2Cases cited1 opinion

Maytag Co. v. Easy Washing Mach. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

Foster v. CarlinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
Parker v. SagerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
Masonic Widows & Orphans Home & Infirmary v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
Permalum Window & Awning Mfg. Co. v. Permalum Window Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.