Legal Opinion

Jelle v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2005No. 04-130PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[T1] The appellant, Timothy Jelle, appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officers. We affirm.

ISSUES

1. Was the appellant in custody when he was interrogated by law enforcement officers?

2. Were the appellant's statements to law enforcement officers voluntarily made?

FACTS

[T2] The appellant entered a conditional guilty plea to felony delivery of a controlled substance. He reserved his right to appeal the district court's denial of his motion to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officers 1 That motion alleged…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Barnes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cohen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Jamie Stuart Snyder v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Nava v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API