Harris v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court. The action was brought in the Morris Common Pleas and the plaintiff had a verdict and judgment which was removed by writ of error to the Supreme Court, and there reversed and the cause remanded for new trial.
Read the full summary
On error to the Supreme Court. The action was brought in the Morris Common Pleas and the plaintiff had a verdict and judgment which was removed by writ of error to the Supreme Court, and there reversed and the cause remanded for new trial. Harris v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co., 48 Vroom 278. Upon a second trial the plaintiff again was successful and the judgment was again removed by writ of error to the Supreme Court which affirmed the judgment below in the following per curiam opinion: “First. The instruction of the trial court to the jury upon the question of the measure…
1Opinion of the Court
*458, The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
Upon the second review in the Supreme Court the question whether damages were recoverable for the indignity and ignominy to which plaintiff claimed to have been subjected at the time his ticket was taken up, was again argued and the Supreme Court followed its previous ruling.
The question has been further argued in this court on the present writ of error, and after full consideration, we are of opinion that there was no error in the ruling of the trial court or of the Supreme Court in this regard. The language of the Supreme Court, in its…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Tarr v. CiasulliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Gray v. Serruto Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Muniz v. United Hosps. Med. Ctr. Pres. Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Hafner v. HafnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Calliari v. SugarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.