Silka v. Quinn

This action was submitted and argued in connec*597tion with No. 5789, The Baldwin Star Coal Company v. Quinn et al., ante, 590. The judgment, for plaintiffs on the first trial was reversed by the court of appeals for the same reason that required a reversal in the other cause.—19 Col. App. 507. The facts out of which the controversy arose are the same in the two actions,- and the evidence was substantially the same at both trials. This action is by the lessees of the coal company, to recover damages sustained by them as the result of the service of the writ of injunction referred to in the…