Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Nathan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1905No. 13,873Published

Error to tlie district court for Cuming county: Conrad Hollenbeck, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duppie, C.

Hanson, plaintiff in error, owns the northwest quarter of section 33, township 24, range 5, in Cuming county, Nebraska. Nathan, defendant in error, is the owner of the northeast quarter of the same section. A survey establishing the boundary line between these two quarter sections was run and established in the year 1870, and the present owners, and those through whom they claim title, occupied the lands up to the line thus established doivn to the year 1901. About this time a controversy arose between Hanson and Nathan relating to this boundary line, and Hanson procured a survey of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Railway Officials & Employes Accident Ass'n v. DrummondNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hansen v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gregory v. KaarNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Farmers & Merchants Insurance v. DobneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Schmid v. SchmidNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API