Farmers & Merchants Insurance v. Dobney
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from tbe district court for Holt county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J. This cause was taken to tbe supreme court of tbe United States, on writ of error issued by Justice Brewer, October 14, 1901. A reversal is claimed because, as alleged, tbe decision is contrary to tbe doctrine announced in Gulf, O. & /S'. F. II. Go. v. Filis, 165 U. S., 150. — Reporter.
1Opinion of the Court
Day, 0.
For brevity tbe parties will be referred to as “plaintiff” and “defendant” as they appear in tbe court below.
This action was brought by plaintiff on appeal from tbe county court to tbe district court of Holt county, against tbe defendant, tbe basis of tbe action being an insurance policy issued by tbe defendant to tbe plaintiff, dated April 26, 1892, and expiring April 26, 1897. Tbe consideration *215for tlie policy was plaintiff’s note for $86, dated April 26, 1892, and due December 1, 1892. The specific property covered by the policy and the amount of insurance thereon were as follows:…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Lamden v. SharpTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
- Vogel v. PekocIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co. v. DeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arkansas Insurance v. McManusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Gano v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Monteleone v. Seaboard Fire & Marine Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TaberIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Co. v. SalmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.