In re Butcher
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph Di Blasi, J.
In these three handicapped petitions, the petitioners seek an order of this court under section 232 of the Family Court Act granting the cost of the tuition, plus maintenance at the Summit Residential Treatment Facility. This court is satisfied that, based on the HC-3 forms submitted and the expert testimony adduced at trial, that all three petitioners herein are qualified to receive benefits within the meaning of section 232 of the Family Court Act. (See the discussion of the standards for qualification under section 232 in Matter of Stein, 81 Misc 2d 91, and — Matter of Mecca, 82 Misc 2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re ClaireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- In re DowneyNew York City Family Court · 1973
- In re KirschnerNew York City Family Court · 1973
- In re LogelNew York City Family Court · 1974
- In re Charilyn "N"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re DenlowNew York City Family Court · 1976
- In re MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re StevensonNew York City Family Court · 1976