Legal Opinion

Allen v. Unigard Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1980No. 35635, 35636, 35637PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Justice.

This case comes before the court on a writ of certiorari which was granted for the purpose of considering whether the Court of Appeals properly applied the law of Vigilant Ins. Co. v. Bowman, 128 Ga. App. 872 (198 SE2d 346) (1973).

Unigard, plaintiff in the trial court, brought suit against defendant Zimmerman’s, Inc. for breach of a loan receipt agreement prohibiting Zimmerman’s from making any settlement with parties potentially liable for a certain casualty loss. Unigard’s action against the other defendants is based upon the claim that these defendants induced Zimmerman’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vigilant Insurance v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Zimmerman's, Inc. v. McDonough Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Holcombe v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Unigard Insurance v. Zimmerman's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Insurance v. WelchelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Five Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Tom's Amusement Co. v. Total Vending ServicesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Maryland Casualty Insurance v. WelchelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API