Legal Opinion

Fullerton Lumber Co. v. Korth

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beilfuss, J.(1) Is a materialman’s lien asserted under sec. 289.02 (1), Stats., dependent upon the existence of a contract between the prime contractor and the owner of the premises under sec. 289.01 (4) ?(2) Does a materialman asserting a lien under sec. 289.02 (1), Stats., derive his title to the cause of action “from, through or under” a deceased owner so as to bring into play the provisions of the dead-man’s statute, sec. 325.16?

Defendant-executrix contends that plaintiff may not avail itself of a statutory lien unless it proves an express contract between the deceased owner and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Habrich v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Findorff v. FindorffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Engfer v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Spiegel v. Silver Lake Beach Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. J. Romberger Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BrockfeldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. State v. HarlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. LunzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. MoffettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Fullerton Lumber Co. v. KorthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API