Legal Opinion

Maiale v. Procaccino

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided June 16, 2005No. 0638Published

1Opinion of the Court

CARRAFIELLO, J,

Eugene Maiale, plaintiff below, appeals the April 4, 2005 order of the Court of Common Pleas granting defendants, Virgil and Norma Procaccino’s, motion in limine to preclude the testimony of any expert witnesses on behalf of plaintiff and their motion for summary judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Eugene Maiale (appellant) is the owner of a building comprising three residential trinity type townhouses located at 227 Fitzwaier Street in Philadelphia. In early 2002, Virgil and Norma Procaccino (appellees) purchased property located at 229 Fitzwater Street, which is adjacent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Okkerse v. HoweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Community Medical Services of Clearfield Inc. v. Local 2665, American Federation of StateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Golden v. Dion & RosenauSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API