Golden v. Dion & Rosenau
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*508BECK, Judge:
This case requires us to construe and apply the principle that judges of coordinate jurisdiction sitting in the same court and in the same case should not overrule the decisions of each other.” Okkerse v. Howe, 521 Pa. 509, 556 A.2d 827, 831 (1989). Since we find that this rule was not complied with in this case, we reverse the order on appeal granting appellees’ preliminary objections and dismissing appellant’s complaint.1
On January 27, 1988, plaintiff appellant Lamar Golden filed a complaint against defendants appellees, Dion & Rosenau (a law firm), Dennis Veneziale, Esquire,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Okkerse v. HoweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Salerno v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. EckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Vincent v. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Harrity v. Medical College of Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.