Legal Opinion

Dayton Monetary Associates v. Becker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1998No. C.A. Case No. 16766. T.C. Case No. 96-973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

This case might best be described as “The Never-Ending Story,” since the current appeal is the third time these plaintiffs and defendants have knocked heads in the court of appeals over the defendants’ obligation to pay certain capital calls. In both prior appeals, defendants won the round on technicalities. First, in Dayton Securities Assoc. v. Avutu (1995), 105 Ohio App.3d 559, 664 N.E.2d 954, we decided that the judgment against defendants could not stand because the plaintiffs had failed to file partnership certificates with the county recorder as required by R.C. 1777.02.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Noroski v. FalletOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. MuethingOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. LaCourse v. FleitzOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Spayd v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re WellsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. Kassoudji v. StampsOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Beard v. Dir. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API