Legal Opinion
Spayd v. Turner
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 1985No. Nos. 84-1028 and 84-1041PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
In his appeal to this court, plaintiff Spayd contends both lower courts erred in their determination that, due to ethical considerations, there could be no accounting for goodwill upon the dissolution of a *59law partnership. Plaintiff further argues that the facts presented herein clearly establish a measurable element of goodwill within the operation of this particular law firm.
At the outset, it is beneficial to set forth a number of general principles emanating from R.C. Chapter 1775, the Uniform Partnership Law, which are applicable to this case in controversy. It is of utmost importance to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis Dispatch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Stern v. SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- In Re the Marriage of HallWashington Supreme Court · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Med Corp., Inc. v. City of Lima and David J. Berger, Both Individually and in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lima, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- McConnell v. Hunt Sports EnterprisesOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Dorsey v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Dawson v. White & CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- King v. HouselOhio Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.