Legal Opinion
United States v. Conkins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 18, 1993No. Nos. 91-10306, 91-10307, 91-10310, 91-10314, 91-10322, 91-10323 and 91-10373PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants were convicted of multiple counts of importation of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. In addition, all appellants with the exception of Linda Conldns and Robert Sandvig were convicted of conspiracy to import and distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 963, 841(a)(1), and 846.
Linda Conldns and Salvador Soto-Mendoza appeal their jury convictions. In addition,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Leo BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- United States v. Anthony Wayne Fagan, United States of America v. Anthony Wayne FaganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Vance v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lorenzo NaranjoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Blaine Travis FifieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.