Legal Opinion

Gilluly v. Miller

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1995No. 94-544PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

Plaintiff, Shaun Gilluly, appeals from the decision of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court disallowing as costs the expense of videotaped depositions used by the plaintiff at trial in which the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. We reverse.

Background

Plaintiff Shaun Gilluly filed a complaint for injuries he received to his neck and upper back in a rear-end collision caused by the defendant, Kie Miller. Gilluly sought recovery under a negligence claim for his compensatory damages and also sought punitive damages on the basis that Miller was highly intoxicated when he caused the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thayer v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cash v. Otis Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lovely v. Burroughs CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Sage v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. v. SelscoMontana Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mularoni v. BingMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Springer v. BeckerMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Smith v. General Mills, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fisher v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Springer v. BeckerMontana Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API