Legal Opinion

Brusco Tug & Barge Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 1, 2001No. 00-1183PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

Rejecting petitioner’s argument that mates on its tugboats are supervisors within the meaning of the NLRA, the National Labor Relations Board found that petitioner, by interfering with its mates’ right to organize, committed an unfair labor practice. Because the Board failed adequately to explain its decision, we deny enforcement and remand for further proceedings.

I

Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act prohibits employers from interfering with their employees’ right to organize. 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

National Labor Relations Board v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
National Labor Relations Board v. Adam & Eve Cosmetics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
Passaic Daily News, T/a the Herald News v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
American Diversified Foods, Inc., D/B/A Arby's v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
Conagra, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

West Deptford Energy, LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
Williams Gas Processing-Gulf Coast Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
El Conejo Americano of Texas, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
Nathan Katz Realty, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
Jochims v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.