Legal Opinion

Ferreri v. Dworman Associates, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is a motion by defendant L & J Concrete Corp. to preclude plaintiff or for a further bill of particulars of plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff sues for damages to his building caused by defendants’ demolition of an adjoining-building and party wall.

As a general rule, of course, an allegation of general damages does not have to be particularized (Wolff v. Hubert, 200 App. Div. 124, 125). But, here, the moving party is requesting a particularization of the damaged items and the cost of repairing each item. The complaint, in paragraph 12 thereof, alleges damage to various parts of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartshorn v. . ChaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Wolff v. HubertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Padula v. Richfield Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Stawiasz v. CreadonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. Weinstein v. O'LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrew McMichael v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  2. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Lasalle Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Gevinson v. Kirkeby-Natus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API