Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. O'Leary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendant, John O’Leary, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 10th day of January, 1908, denying the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 22d day of January, 1908, resettling the prior order.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The action is for damages to personal property and for injury to the freehold, and is a case in which a bill of particulars is peculiarly appropriate. The plaintiffs have been able to estimate the gross damage which they deem themselves to have suffered, and should find' no difficulty in stating the details thereof.

*268The order appealed from must, therefore, be; reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted except as to the sixth -item of particulars demanded.-

Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, LauGhlin, Clarke and Scott, Jj.

Order reversed, with ten…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferreri v. Dworman Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API