Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentShort, Judge
I respectfully dissent because (1) the Commissioner’s conclusion of comparability is supported by the record and applicable *780law, and (2) Polley failed to give her employer notice of the complained-of conditions.
First, I find no basis either in the record or in existing law to reverse the Commissioner’s conclusion of comparability. The record demonstrates the position given to Polley upon her return1 was comparable in terms of duties, hours, and pay to the position she held prior to her leave. Although the general manager admitted Pol-ley’s new job responsibilities were different, he testified…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. City Stores, Inc., Doing Business as Loveman'sCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Larson v. Department of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Tru-Stone Corp. v. GutzkowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Burtman v. Dealers Discount SupplyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Youa True Vang v. A-1 Maintenance ServiceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.