State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Giger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, V.C.J.
¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? 1 (2) Is a public censure an appropriate disciplinary sanction for the breach of professional ethics set forth in count one of the complaint? and (3) Is dismissal without prejudice an appropriate disposition of count two of the complaint? We answer all three questions in the affirmative.
I
INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD
¶ 2 The Oklahoma Bar…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Oklahoma Department of Public Safety v. McCradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Valley View Angus Ranch, Inc. v. Duke Energy Field Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Clark v. Zwanziger (In Re Zwanziger)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Burris v. Burris (In re Burris)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.