Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rivas v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 8, 2000No. 14-98-00431-CVPublished

1Dissent

The majority opinion has effectively ruled that an ambulance driver, who is tired and wants to get a belligerent, uncooperative patient to the hospital as quickly as possible, can violate traffic and safety laws, disregard governmental rules and regulations, run a red light, slam into another vehicle, and be immune from liability as a matter of law. I disagree, particularly in light of controlling case law and evidence to the contrary.

Official immunity as an affirmative defense to personal liability arises only in context of the good faith performance of a discretionary duty. See Wadewitz v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wadewitz v. MontgomeryTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API