Legal Opinion

Jendrusina v. Mishra

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2016No. Docket 325133PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

Plaintiff, Kerry Jendrusina, filed this medical malpractice case against his primary care providers, Dr. Shyam Mishra, a specialist in internal medicine, and Shyam N. Mishra, M.D., PC. Defendants moved for summary disposition, asserting that plaintiffs notice of intent to sue, and therefore the complaint, had not been timely filed. Plaintiff responded that the claim had been initiated within the six-month discovery period defined by the Legislature in MCL 600.5838a. That statute provides, in pertinent part, “[A]n action involving a claim based on medical malpractice may be commenced. . .…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Solowy v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Velez v. TumaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Kincaid v. CardwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. DowdyMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. EgglestonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colleen Lavalley v. St Mary Mercy HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Delaney Lonsway v. Yale UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Estate of Kelly M Bowman v. St John Hospital and Medical CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Estate of Kelly M Bowman v. St John Hospital and Medical CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Estate of Kelly M Bowman v. St John Hospital and Medical CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API