Crowly v. Thornbrough
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lee Seamster, Chief Justice.
The appellant, J. C. Crowly, proceeding as a taxpayer, instituted this suit in the Pulaski Circuit Court, Third Division. The complaint was filed pursuant to Act 274 of 1953, praying for a declaratory judgment and asking that the court enter a holding that Act 115 of 1955, is unconstitutional and void in violation of the constitutional rights of the appellant and other taxpayers similarly situated.
Tlie appellants’ complaint alleged that Act 115 of 1955 was nnconstitntional and void due to the following reasons:
“(a) It delegates legislative power to the Commissioner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Holgate Bros. v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Smithberger v. BanningNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Hutchins v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- City of Joplin v. Industrial Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- City of Oklahoma City v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of LaborSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Cheney v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.