Legal Opinion

People v. Spirlin

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 2000No. E023770PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, J.

I

Introduction

Following the close of the prosecution’s case-in-chief in a robbery trial, the defense rested without presenting any opening statement or evidence. Defendant made a Marsden1 motion, which was denied after a hearing. Thereafter, the jury convicted defendant of committing felony robberies of a Shell gas station on August 24, 1996, and September 20, 1996, while personally armed (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 12022.5, subd. (a) and 1192.7, subd. *123(c)(8)2), and in doing so, falsely imprisoning his victims. (§ 236.) The jury further found defendant guilty of three counts of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. SifuentesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. DaveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. People v. Malcolm M.California Court of Appeal · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API