People v. Spirlin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, J.
I
Introduction
Following the close of the prosecution’s case-in-chief in a robbery trial, the defense rested without presenting any opening statement or evidence. Defendant made a Marsden1 motion, which was denied after a hearing. Thereafter, the jury convicted defendant of committing felony robberies of a Shell gas station on August 24, 1996, and September 20, 1996, while personally armed (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 12022.5, subd. (a) and 1192.7, subd. *123(c)(8)2), and in doing so, falsely imprisoning his victims. (§ 236.) The jury further found defendant guilty of three counts of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. SifuentesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. DaveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. Malcolm M.California Court of Appeal · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.