Legal Opinion

American MacHinery Co. v. Haley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 14, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to District Court, Dallas County; Kenneth Eoree, Judge. Action by B. E. Plaley against the American Machinery Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

Defendant in error sued plaintiff in error for damages for personal injuries sustained by defendant in error while employed by plaintiff in error as a common laborer; the precise grounds of negligence alleged being the failure of the plaintiff in error to provide defendant in error a reasonably safe place for the performance of the duties of his employment. Plaintiff in error met the charge of negligence by the general denial and pleas of assumed risk and contributory negligence. Trial by jury resulted in verdict for defendant in error, followed by appropriate judgment, from which this writ…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. I. G.N.R.R. Co. v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. BingleTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Peck v. PeckTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. OverturfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winnsboro Cotton Oil Co. v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. WinklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. De Leon v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WaldoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Clayton v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API