Hanford v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered October 4, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to quiet title, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Respondent brought action and had judgment to quiet title in him to a certain block-of land known as “East Park,” or block 32, Hanford’s addition to South Seattle. The city claims this land as a public park. - It is a part of the same plat of land involved in the case of *258Meacham v. Seattle, 45 Wash. 380, 88 Pac. 628, but the status of this particular tract as a public ground was not there involved or considered. The contention of appellant, briefly stated, is that a parcel of ground included within a plat of lots and blocks, streets and alleys, dedicating the streets and alleys and “other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Rhodes v. Town of BrightwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Steel v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Meacham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- City of Spokane v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Brownsville v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Knudsen v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- M.K.K.I., Inc. v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- MKKI, INC. v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006