Legal Opinion
Gold v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 19, 1981No. 78 C 2570PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
COSTANTINO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Marvin Gold, (“Gold”) seeks a refund of token payments made by him for his alleged violation of 26 United States Code § 6672. 1 The one hundred percent penalty assessment represents plaintiff’s failure to account for and pay over taxes imposed upon the employees of Combined Property Services, Inc. (“Combined”) for the third and fourth quarters of 1972. Gold paid part of the assessment made against him and then filed a timely claim for refund. The United States filed a counterclaim for the unpaid portion of the penalty…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Mazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Roland J. Kalb v. United States of America, and Third-Party v.jerome L. Herold, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Ware v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Internal Revenue Service v. BlaisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- Schwinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Geiger v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1984
- Abramson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.