Legal Opinion

Geiger v. United States

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 18, 1984No. CIV 81-895 PHX-CAMPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MUECKE, Chief Judge.

This is an action for the refund of $100, plus costs, which was paid by plaintiff as a result of an assessment of a penalty of $23,317.35 by the defendant. This Court has jurisdiction over the complaint and counterclaim presently before it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1) and Rule 13 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff is a citizen of the United States who began performing services for Standard Roofing and Supply Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation, on August 26, 1976, and for All American Enterprises, Inc., (Standard’s parent corporation), on January 3,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Waymon Leon Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Edward J. Bloom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Edwin A. And Pauline Teel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Pacific National Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richard L. Gephart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. Prescott v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Krech v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Salzillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API