Legal Opinion
Smith v. Local Union 28 Sheet Metal Workers
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 28, 1995No. 92 Civ. 4414 (JES)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Wayne Smith, acting pro se, 1 brings the instant action against Sheet Metal Workers’ Local Union No. 28 (“Local 28”), the Local Union 28 Joint Apprenticeship Committee (the “JAC”), Joseph Casey, Murray Liebowitz, Arthur Moore, Christine Ratliff and CW Sheet Metal Company, Inc. (collectively “defendants”). 2 In this action, Smith asserts numerous claims based upon Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1985 and § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. Defendants move for summary judgment on…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Elizabeth SHERLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Skeete v. IVF America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Jenkins v. Arcade Building MaintenanceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Tarr v. Credit Suisse Asset Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Holmes v. NBC/GEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.