Geddes v. Tri-State Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
Defendant, the insurer under a liability indemnity policy issued to plaintiff, a psychiatrist, appeals from a judgment declaring its obligation under that policy to defend an action for slander against plaintiff.
The policy in question was denominated “Psychiatrist’s Professional Liability.” Defendant, by this policy, agreed to indemnify plaintiff on account of loss from “such damages as may be awarded against the Assured in respect of professional services rendered by him in his practice of psychiatry . . . resulting from any claims or suits . . . based solely upon malpractice . . . assault,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Associated Lathing & Plastering Co. v. Louis C. Dunn, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Higgins v. California Petroleum & Asphalt Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Alperson v. Mirisch Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Records v. Aetna Life & Cas. Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Inglewood Radiology Medical Group, Inc. v. Hospital Shared Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- DIRECTV v. Factory Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Van Ness & Sperry, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992