Iowa Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Fairmont
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiffs’ alternative motion for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law or for a new trial.
The facts are undisputed. Defendant, city of Fairmont, referred to hereinafter as the city, is a city of the fourth class operating under a home rule charter adopted in 1927. Prior to that time it operated under a home rule charter adopted in 1901. Plaintiff Iowa Electric Light and Power Company, referred to hereinafter as the gas company, is an Iowa corporation licensed to do business in Minnesota, and it was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Warren v. First Division of St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. v. City of BoonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Ford Motor Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Illinois Cities Water Co. v. City of Mt. VernonIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Anderson v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- DEDEAUX UTILITY CO. v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Rochester v. People's Cooperative Power Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- City of St. Louis Park v. Almor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.