Legal Opinion

Scoggins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1924No. 8400Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION EOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— It is urged that we were in error in holding that there was no reversible error revealed by the failure of the trial court to define the term “intoxicated.”

There was no evidence for the appellant. One of the State’s witnesses testified that while the appellant was driving his car and officers were trying to stop him, he came very near running over them. They finally stopped and arrested him. The witness said:

“The defendant was drunk. I smelled intoxicating liquor on his breath. When he got out of the car, we had to hold him up so he could…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paris & Great Northern Railroad v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hughes v. State ex rel. SuttonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API