Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Proctor

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1943No. 14456PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

The plaintiffs demurred to the answer of the tax-commissioner and the tax-assessors, on the ground that the facts set up were insufficient in law to operate as an estoppel on the appeal, which under the law could not be filed until the written notice had been received.

The formal written notice dated May 27, 1942, advising-plaintiffs that their claim for a 1942 homestead exemption had been disallowed, further advised them that during its May-June, 1941, session, the board of tax-assessors disallowed the full claim for a 1941 exemption, after conferring with plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flint River Steamboat Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  2. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New York v. HuhnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Hudgins Contracting Co. v. RedmondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Butler Marble & Granite Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. WimpySupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  2. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Tec America, Inc. v. DeKalb County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Harper v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Jones v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API