Legal Opinion

Hill v. Morrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1928No. Docket No. 4553PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, J., pro tem.

This cause is based upon an alleged damage to fruit trees by cattle belonging to, or controlled by, the defendants W. H. and W. W. Glass. The trial court entered an order of nonsuit as to all other defendants and they are not before this court. The trees, about 850 in number, are in a mountainous orchard in San Bernardino County which is entirely surrounded by the area known as Angeles National Forest. The action was tried before the court without a jury and the judgment was awarded against said W. H. and W. W. Glass for the sum of $1,400 with costs, but, after motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shearer v. Park Nursery Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Montgomery v. LockeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Posz v. BurchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Santa Barbara Pistachio Ranch v. Chowchilla Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Rilovich v. RaymondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Baker v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Baker v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API