Legal Opinion
Hartsville Theatres, Inc. v. Fox
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 23, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 70-245PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge:
Claiming a violation of their First Amendment rights as a result of certain proceedings begun under Section 16-414.2, Code of South Carolina (1962), plaintiffs seek both injunctive and declaratory relief. We dismiss.
The facts giving rise to this controversy are not in dispute. On March 13, 1970, the plaintiffs exhibited commercially at a theatre in Aiken, South Carolina, the film “Cherry, Harry and Raquel”, The defendants, who are the *260Sheriff and Assistant Solicitor of Aiken County, personally viewed the film at a commercial showing by the plaintiffs on that…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garrett v. HoffmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Joachim Memorial Home v. AskewDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1975