Criswell v. Board of Directors of Everett School District No. 24
Washington Supreme Court
Cross appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Denney, J., entered [November 19, 1902, upon the findings and decision of the court, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to restrain the payment of school warrants.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This action was brought in the lower court by the plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer, to restrain the payment of certain school warrants, issued by the officers of school district No. 24, in Snohomish county, in payment of the contract price of a school building for said district, constructed by defendant Grant. TJpon a trial the court entered a decree, restraining payment of a part of the warrants and refusing to restrain payment of the balance, and also ordered the school district to pay $500 as an attorney’s fee to plaintiff’s attorneys. The plaintiff appeals from that part of the decree…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bass Foundry v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Arnott v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. MetschanOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Stallcup v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Green v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Jones v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Appleford v. Snake River Mining, Milling & Smelting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Ettor v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.