Legal Opinion

Rohr v. Rohr

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1985No. 20425Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from an order modifying a decree of divorce restricting his visitation rights with his minor daughter and requiring him to bring current past due alimony and child support. Defendant has made no appearance in this appeal. We affirm as modified.

Plaintiff and defendant were divorced in 1982. Both parties subsequently petitioned the court for a modification of the decree with respect to child visitation and financial support arrearages, plaintiff seeking extended visitation rights, and defendant requesting severe restrictions. After a hearing on the petitions for modification,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barbour v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Horton v. HortonUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Raible v. RaibleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Ledsome v. LedsomeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Reardon v. ReardonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API