Legal Opinion

Nordean v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Douglas county : Feawk; A. Ross, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimlin, J.

The complaint in this action showed that the plaintiff was ten years of age and appeared by guardian ad litem, and that on October 23, 1909, and for a long time prior to that day the defendant railway corporation was, ever since has been, and now is, operating and running a railroad for gain and profit, running engines-and cars over and upon its tracks in Douglas county, and that its right of way was unfenced. The answer contains a number of specific admissions, followed by a general denial, among them the admission that the right of way was not fenced. The injury in question occurred on the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Curry v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  2. State ex rel. Bashford v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Houston & Great Northern Railroad v. MeadorTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. State v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Littig v. HanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Julius v. DruckreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. United States Fire Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State ex rel. Lake Nebagamon Ice Co. v. McPheeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Gladstone Equity Exchange Co. v. HinesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. May v. Tri-County Trails CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API