Legal Opinion

David A. Field and Ellen J. Field v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 2, 2003No. Docket 02-6163PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court had jurisdiction over Plaintiffs-Appellants’ tax refund action. This Court holds that jurisdiction is not foreclosed by 26 U.S.C. § 7422(h) (2000) and that the district court can properly exercise jurisdiction over this matter. Therefore, the district court’s decision is reversed and the case is remanded for consideration of the merits of the action.

District courts generally have subject matter jurisdiction over tax refund claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1). However, under 26 U.S.C. § 7422(h), “[n]o action may be brought…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990
  2. Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Affiliated Equipment Leasing II v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Duffie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Keener v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. David A. Field and Ellen J. Field v. United States of America, Docket No. 03-6246-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. McGann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API