Simmons v. Miller
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. R. T. McKisick, and Downey, Pullen & Downey, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff and defendant were formerly wife and husband, but they were divorced in 1911. In 1913 a twenty-year semi-tontine policy of insurance on defendant’s life matured and exercising an option given him under the contract he surrendered the policy to the company which had issued it and received the sum of $3,174.53. The plaintiff sued for her alleged community interest in this money. At the trial of the cause, after issue joined, plaintiff’s proofs were offered and thereupon defendant’s motion for nonsuit was granted. Judgment was entered in defendant’s favor. From said judgment and from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Travelers' Insurance v. HealeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Wallace v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Townsend's Assignee v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Tennes v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of CastagnolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Simmons v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Denike v. DenikeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Compeer Financial, ACA, et al. v. Michael Graham, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- North Bay Credit Union v. MRB Direct, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.