Legal Opinion

Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. v. City of Tucson Department of Procurement

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 4, 2009No. 2 CA-CV 2009-0022PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant City of Tucson appeals from the superior court’s judgment partially overturning the City Procurement Director’s determination upholding liquidated damages assessed against appellee, Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. (hereinafter REL). The City also appeals the superior court’s order granting REL’s request for attorney fees. Because substantial evidence supports the Director’s decision, we reverse the superior court.

Facts and Procedural History

¶2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the administrative decision of the City Procurement…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. Woerth v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Eastern Vanguard Forex Ltd. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Barlow v. PostbCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  3. Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Gilbert MH LLC v. Gilbert Family Hospital LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  5. Gilbert MH LLC v. Gilbert Family Hospital LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API