Legal Opinion

State v. Holbert

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1966No. 31922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

This is an appeal by defendant from a conviction for violating Section 338.010, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., which makes it unlawful for one not a licensed pharmacist to dispense or sell drugs prescribed by a physician. Defendant was represented in the trial by counsel of his own choice but he has filed no brief in this court, and in that situation we will review all' assignments of error properly raised in defendant’s motion for a new trial and those matters specified in Supreme Court Rules 28.02 and 28.08, V.A.M.R. State v. Johnson, Mo., 394 S.W.2d 344.

The pertinent part of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Commonwealth v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holbert v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Hayes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Dickson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Duensing v. HuscherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API