Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Egan

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1933No. Docket No. 1754PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.—The

appellant Frank J. Egan and Albert J. Tinnin were tried jointly and found guilty of first degree murder, the jury fixing the penalty at life imprisonment; and on September 14, 1932, they were sentenced ae cordingly. Throughout the trial they were represented by separate counsel, and each filed a separate notice of appeal. Egan’s notice was filed the day sentence was pronounced, but he took no steps whatever to obtain a record on appeal; and on July 24, 1933, the attorney-general moved for a dismissal.

Section 7 of Rule II of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. People v. RutledgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. VincentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. TinninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. In Re EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Frank Egan v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API