Legal Opinion

Burke v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 24, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner—

Reversing.

The question to be decided is whether the trial court committed error in giving a peremptory instruction for the defendant in the suit of the appellant, D. F. Burke, against the appellee, Arthur Johnson, for damages for alienating his wife’s affections. It is the nature of the ground upon which a reversal of the judgment is asked and not the nature of the case that requires a statement of the evidence in detail.

The plaintiff and Fannie Wainscott were married in 1926 and lived together until about July 1, 1936, when they separated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scott v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Merritt v. CravensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Melcher v. MelcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Deitzman v. MullinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  5. Leucht v. LeuchtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morey v. KellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Stoll v. PlarrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959
  3. Boden v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API