Legal Opinion

People v. Tolliver

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1960No. Crim. 3660PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobeiner, J.

Andrew L. Tolliver, convicted of grand theft and possession of narcotics, appeals from the narcotics conviction. His two contentions that the evidence does not support the judgment and that the prosecution’s courtroom experiment constitutes prejudicial error fail to present sufficient bases to reverse the judgment.

We set forth briefly the salient facts. Assigned to a radio car, San Francisco Officers Cisneros and Bishop inspected it for certain equipment before going on duty on the night of December 19, 1950. They also checked to see if any property had been left in the ear, Cisneros going to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. BlodgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. AntistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. Van ValkenburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. One 1959 Plymouth SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. People v. BirchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. HendrixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API