Legal Opinion

Howard Walther v. Steven Kane

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 2, 2015No. 14-13836UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Howard Walther and Dorothy B. Walther (collectively, the Walthers), the beneficiaries of the James Walther Revocable Life Insurance Trust (the Trust), appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Steven Kane, Esq. and Kane and Koltun, Attorneys at Law (collectively, Kane). Kane served as the attorney for the trustee, Patrick Walther (Trustee). 1 The single issue on appeal is whether, under Florida law, an attorney retained to represent only the trustee also owes a fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries of the trust. The district court held an attorney retained to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Gary A. Levinson v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Bravo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. In Re Estate of GoryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. McCormick v. CoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bivins v. RogersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  2. Johana Colon, Christine Rundberg, and Anthony Womack on behalf of the Advanced Diagnostic Group Employee Stock Ownership Trust v. Moore & Van Allen PLLC, and Michael E. ZellerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API