Legal Opinion
Bravo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 3, 2009No. 06-13052PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and STAGG,* District Judge. PER CURIAM:
The appellants have filed a petition for rehearing en banc, which under 11th Cir. R. 35-5 is treated as including a petition for rehearing before the original panel. To the extent that it is a petition for rehearing en banc, no judge in active service having requested that the Court be polled, the petition is denied. To the extent it is a petition for panel rehearing, we deny the petition but take this opportunity to extend our opinion to clarify the methodology to be used in determining…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Pisciotta v. Old National BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. Por A. v. LamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Pendergast v. Sprint Nextel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- James L. Turner v. Theodore v. Wells, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Alliant Tax Credit 31, Inc. v. M. Vincent Murphy, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- LeFrere v. QuezadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.